|
|
| *SoulEyes Photography>>>Art Gallery |
Hypothetical situation? |
Person A and Person B work on an art project together, but person A doesn鈥檛 have a car, so Person B must transport the art project to the gallery. A little while into the trip Person B decides they do not want to show their art project at the gallery, not sure if they are ready to become an artist, not wanting to give up their currently non-artistic lifestyle, and is afraid the project might somehow damage their car, and instead decides to throw the project in the garbage. When Person A learns of this, they are distraught, for they wanted to be an artist, and said to person B 鈥渢hat鈥檚 not fair! I put just as much work into that project as you did! I should have been consulted!鈥?br /> Person B replies> 鈥淪orry, but it鈥檚 my car that was transporting it, so I am the one who gets to decide whether or not we will become artists.鈥?br /> Who鈥檚 right and who鈥檚 wrong? Person B is wrong. If they decided not to be an artist, they should have left the project in Person A's hands. Ah, cute analogy to abortion. You forgot to mention that once the gallery accepts the project and signs them on as artists, person A plans to leave town and let person B do all the work. Perhaps person A ought to legally form a business partnership with person B, and agree to split the work and the profits. Person B is wrong!!!! He should have talked this over with the other and came to some agreement. Person b could have been listed as an unknown on the project. person b is wrong. he/she wasn't the only one that spent time working on the project. if the person was having 2nd thoughts, fine. but to trhow away someone elses work, that's plain rude. they should have called person A up and told them how they felt, and let person A decide if they wanted to carry out the project on their own and figure out how to get the project to the gallery. person B was not only thinking of themselves, but seems (to me) to have communication issues. but if the first person to answer this question is correct, and your question is an analogy for abortion, then I say they're both wrong. They're both at fault for not communicating with each other and coming to a decision together. Person A is selfish for assuming person B would want the same things he does. Person B is wrong for not finding out how person A felt before she made her decision. and you're wrong for not just coming out and asking what you wanted to ask. no need to play games here buddy. we're all entitled to our opinion. you're trying to doctor a question just to prove a point, and that's not the way to do it. a "project" that two people worked on together is not the same thing as two people having sex and creating a life in the process of that sexual encounter. sorry, but you can confuse an apple for an orange...just doesn't work. Who ever was needing the car could of found another way to trasport it! the human who just tossed it should of consulted... tip for the human who wants to be an artist! do it alone or have EVERYTHING in writing proir to any transportation or booth or event! always put out the WHAT IF's then stuff like the above will not happen! sucks but your both wrong and your both right! I would be mad if some one just destroyed my art work! and i would express my feelings on that! however sometimes that's the price you pay for depending on another human! and it sucks! best wishes don't give up Person B is wrong. When P.B decided that he didn't want to become an artist, he should have contacted P.A and told P.A how he felt and that he would bring the piece of art to P.A so that P.A could decide what to do with it. P.B could have taken his name off of the project and told P.A not to inform anyone of his involvement in the project(could have labeled it By Person A and anonymous). I believe that Person B should give Person A some kind of compensation for the destruction of the piece of art. BTW, this is the Women's Study section, not the Ethics section(or, if there is no section that deals with Ethics, maybe the Etiquette section). And if this is an "analogy" to abortion, this is the perfect reason why analogies are misleading crocks of shite. Your analogy is interesting (and obvious) although slightly lacking. The situation would be more like this: Person A and person B accidentally have a bunch of art supplies which are scattered and spilled in the car of person B. Person A says "great why don't you get all these supplies together and I will be over here continuing with my life as normal and when you have all the supplies together we can become artists." Person B sees that the art supplies have spilled all over the inside of the car and realizes it will be a lot of effort and time to get these art supplies together Person B would lose time at work, take trips to the car repair, and Person B doesn't want to be an artist and really doubts that Person A will be there to help with the creating and nurturing the art. So person B decides to get the car cleaned professionally getting rid of the unwanted art supplies. Is Person B wrong? |
| Tags |
| Photography Jobs Photography Equipment Photography Courses Photo Gallery Photo Essays Art Gallery Wedding Photography Stock Photography Product Photography Jewelry Photography |
Photography Categories--Copyright/IP Policy--Contact Webmaster |