|
|
| *SoulEyes Photography>>>Art Gallery |
What do you think of artist Jill Greenberg's contraversial pictures of crying children? |
Some people have said this amounts to child abuse, making kids cry in the name of art? http://arts.guardian.co.uk/gallery/0,,18... I saw them on the news last night, and think they were disgusting, but what puzzled me was, where were their parents while they were crying, they had to be there because jill greenberg said they had been paid. So the parents have to take some of the blame about what happened. It is not art and not funny at all... I do not like it, its not artisitic in any way, shape or form. I actually think it's digusting i agree with joy RP. they are quite disturbing, why would anyone call pictures of children in distress art. wow. that really seems unnecessary. it's not as if children don't cry on their own, often enough. is this photography, sloth, or performance art?! while taking candy from a baby doesn't really rate as "abuse", in my book, it's certainly (proverbially) uncool (unless you're concerned for the health of said child). yikes. She's "angry and helpless" over politics and she has the right to taunt children to tears and call it art? Normal people would call it a form of child abuse, but I suppose, since it's classified "Art" no one will say anything to her. And anyone other than me realize that these children are at least Half Nude? This is not like the pics are going to be kept in the family photo album. Child Porn? A 'soft' version of it, maybe? Or am I just blowing it out of proportion? Those were not nice at all. |
| Tags |
| Photography Jobs Photography Equipment Photography Courses Photo Gallery Photo Essays Art Gallery Wedding Photography Stock Photography Product Photography Jewelry Photography |
Photography Categories--Copyright/IP Policy--Contact Webmaster |