I love to take pictures so Which one you think is better? Should i buy both of them? Thanks what if i wanna take pictures of people? Canon Lenses and Reviews
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Canon... (See "Recommendations" on this page)
http://www.photo.net/canon/#lense
http://www.wlcastleman.com/equip/reviews...
http://www.photozone.de/active/news/inde...
http://www.bobatkins.com/photography/ind...
http://www.fredmiranda.com
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/forum....
The Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM (28-135 equiv.) (April 2007-$515) is a good "walk around" lens at a good price.
http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/contro...
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Revie...
Not quite as much of a wide angle, the Canon Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM Autofocus Lens (2007-$1,060) is a pretty good all-around lens. This review says, "If I had only one lens, this would be the one."
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Revie...
Excellent general purpose lens: Canon Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM Autofocus Lens (April 2007-$1,140)
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Revie...
I really like my Nikon 17-55 and Canon makes a comparable lens, the Canon Zoom Super Wide Angle EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Autofocus Lens. It's not an "L" lens, but it seems popular.
http://www.bobatkins.com/photography/rev...
As far as a good choice for photographing people, it depends on how close you want to work and how much of the frame you want them to fill. The very first review site above has many helpful lessons. Good luck and happy reading. That first site is probably all that you need. Report It
If you like to take pictures from people to landscapes, 28-135. The 18-55mm is fine, but you will notice some lens distortion at 18mm (Iike looking through a magnifying glass), though great for photographing flowers, etc. | 