![]() |
|
| *SoulEyes Photography>>>Camera Lens |
Photographers? Do you look through the eye lens (?) on a digital camera or do look at the display? |
I always see ameteurs like me just looking straight at the display. But I see some pros looking through the eye thingy with one eye closed. Does it make a better picture to do that, or is that only for those fancy cameras? In most cases, one eye on the viewfinder while the other eye on the subject or surrounding. On different situation, after framing from the viewfinder with a steady hands, both eyes on the subject only to go back to viewfinder to check the composition. LCD on awkward position of the camera. I try to avoid the digital display. I use the viewer. Helps you hold the camera more steady and give you a better idea of what will be in the frame. Some use the viewer as force of habit. Desplay because my camera dosen't even have a "eye thingy" on my digital camera!! Cameras that pro's use are incapable of utilizing the digital display for composition. So it's not a matter of choice. I am hardly a pro but I have been at it for 50 years and even have some dark room experience. I use the view finder. The only exception is if I am trying to shoot over a crowd or other obstacle. I like the view finder because it locks everything together. I have basically three pointed the camera. Between the two hands holding it and my head stabilizing it I find far less camera movement and hence better pictures. First off, holding the camera at arms length is not the most stable way to support your camera;this is why so many people get blurry images. Holding the camera to your face creates a strong base to hold the camera.Then, you eat up your batteries much faster by looking at the display. There are rare occasions when a display is preferable, but very rare. ..especially in the world of pro photography. i use the display window...but im not pro. lol! so yeah...i dont think it really makes a difference except maybe stabilization. That's a good question. As a semi-pro I am used to only using the eyepiece finder becuase I was trained with Nikon and Canon 35 mm camera's that don't have a display and did not even have autofocus. However, with the advent of digital cams, especially those with HIGH SPEED auto focus, there really not too much need to use the viewfinder through the eyepiece unless you are curious about the f-stops and shutter speeds. I suggest that you continue to use the viewfinder until you are sure you are getting good results, and THEN you can start using the video display finder only. It's mostly a matter of personal preference. 37 years using a Single Lens Reflex and seeing the world through a viewfinder. I only look at the back of the camera to check what film I loaded. I believe you mean the LCD screen or viewfinder... I always use the viewfinder. For most photos it does not matter. If you are taking close ups or ultra close ups you must use the digital display because the eye piece will not show what the camera sees. Those Fancy cameras are SLR camera and looking through the "eye thingy" is showing them an exactly what the lens is seeing. On cheaper camera when you are looking though the "Eye Thingy" you are looking from above and to the left of the lens and your framing will be off. Most DSLRs do not have a "live view" on the back display. You have to use the viewfinder. There are new DSLRs that have live view capabilities, but they are the exception. I prefer to use the display except in bright light. Bright light washes out the display so I switch to the view finder. |
| Related information |
v = distance of intermediate image, w = distance of final image from Real is positive sign convention. Converging lens: 1 / 263 + 1 / v = 1 / 4.70 Real image becomes a virtual object for d... It will depend on the eyeglass lens cleaner. There's really two big worries--1) abrasion and 2) damaging the lens coating. Some eyeglass cleaning fluids are not pure, so they can put micro... You'll have to send it to a Kodak Authorized Service Center. There should be a list on the Kodak web site. Please be aware that if you dropped the camera there will be no warranty coverage.... A 24mm is not a fish-eye lens, by any stretch of the imagination. A 24mm is a wide angle lens, not even a super wide angle lens (18mm or 20mm are considered super wide lenses) A true fish-eye w... It sounds like you are looking for an SLR camera. You can pick up a Canon EOS film camera or a Nikon film camera, just about anywhere that sells cameras. Both are quailty cameras, and they both h... The 28 mm lens is just barely wider. It would probably be hard to tell the difference without examining the edges of identical pictures. A 14 mm lens would be wider. If you get an extra wide len... I have the same camera & had the same issue trying to take a pic like that the other day. I had to hold it super steady & hold my breath while snapping the pick. It only goes "SO CLO... This site may help you: ... |
Photography Categories--Copyright/IP Policy--Contact Webmaster |