![]() |
|
| *SoulEyes Photography>>>Digital Photography |
Which one is better: Darkroom Photography or Digital Photography? |
I'm deciding my classes for next year and I want to get into photography. I have two choices: digital photography or regular photography (using a dark room; chemicals to develop pictures etc.). Which one would be better (your opinion)? Neither or both. There is no definitive answer. In my opinion I would try darkroom photography first to really learn all of the technical aspects of photography. Having said that the future is digital although film will probably always have a place. i took film first and i really loved it. digital is more convenient but you feel like you have so much physical control in the dark room. Dark Room has better quality, but digital doesn't take as much time. I think you would gain a greater understanding of photography by using manual film cameras and processing the film yourself. You should try darkroom first, then move on to digital. I just recently graduated from college, but if I would've been able to fit a darkroom photo class in my schedule instead of just the digital one, I would've done it. Film photo forces you to learn how to compose a shot, how to be picky, and how to develop an eye for things whereas with digital you can just shoot away and then choose what you like. But again, try darkroom first to get an understanding of how to develop your own pictures and how to develop that eye for choosing what's good and what's not. I understand some of the other comments but... would you learn to drive a car by starting on a waggon and horses? Digital is the future of photography. Film is the past of photography. Both can still be used and this gives you an option that is unique at this time. You can study photography's history while many treat it as better in some way and current. I've taken both, and digital allowed me to learn in weeks what would have taken me months or years to learn. With digital you have instant exposure feedback and a record of all your settings. With film, you have to manually record everything and keep track of your records and film. I wasn't good at keeping track, so I wasn't learning much. If you're just beginning to learn about subject matter, lighting, composition, perspective and depth of field, go for the digital course. to echo a few points I prefer digital... my hands had a bad reaction to the chemicals in the darkroom. |
| Related information |
For your 1st question -- A simple way to cut costs while printing photos is to print multiple pictures on one large photo sheet. That is, instead of 4 separate 4R (4 x 6 inch) prints, you can si... www.photo.net ...You may want to google "urban photography". All the UP works I have seen were shot using a small 35mm rangefinder camera using black and white film, then printed using archival methods a... try the local community college, the skill center, or possibly the university if your that close to ASU, NAU or U of A. I know, there is nothing in arizona. ...Sounds like a depth of field problem if some parts are sharp and others out of focus It could be you are becoming more critical of your own work, a good thing. Try using a smaller aperture. ... The problem with digital photography is that so few people actually make prints of their images. And the colour prints that get done in those machines will not have the half life of a black and wh... In all photography, (not just digital) the focal length of the lens is the distance between the optical center of the lens and the film plane or sensor. For instance, a 50mm lens means that the di... No, you just need to adjust the white balance to compensate for your lighting conditions. I don't know. It has reduced film manufacture and developing chemicals, but has increased battery m... |
Photography Categories--Copyright/IP Policy--Contact Webmaster |