![]() |
|
| *SoulEyes Photography>>>Flash Photography |
Night photography on a canon powershot s5 is? |
so far most pictures are grainy and if I'm not doing a skyline just seem very poor quality. low or auto ISO seems to help when doing a skyline but i prefer night portraits of people and small objects in natural light no flash. people in night lighting (bar, streetlights ect) seem to have an orange "aura" and tho its a cool effect i would like to get rid of it. night skies in town with the regular street lights ect are soo grainy with fuzzies all over. I absolutly hate the quality. I have seen people take pictures of the moon where you see all detail, how can I do these types of things and not look like im using a camera phone? so far my kodak handheld takes better night pictures and thats just a shame. Tripod, iso100, F8, 2-15 seconds will do it. The auras are due to large apertures, with f8 you will get a more "star burst" effect. Use a WB balance of say 3200k to remove the orange cast, I prefer 5600k for night shots, try that also maybe. Well, the things you can do to make better night photos, ie., slow shutter speed are screwed if your trying to capture action. Try a flash, camera on a tripod. It isnt natural lighting, but you cant have everything. if your subject is static use a low ISO and a looooooong shutterspead - think of the sensor soaking up light like sponge soaks up water - the longer you leave it in the water the more water it soaks up. That camera is not really built for low light photography. If you look at the 20D and above they have features for processing low light and time exposure images. To change the orange aura look at your white balance settings, should be one for tungsten/indoor lighting. The wonderful pictures of the moon with such detail are done by "stacking" there's a lot to your question. first of all, taking images of the moon is very different than taking pictures in low light. The answer really depends on how much light is available, assessing the exposure, adjusting the ISO, and keeping the camera as still as possible. moving subjects in low light create a challenge for your camera since the sensor is pretty small. |
| Related information |
Your flash from high in the bleachers isn't powerful enough to light anything up. All it's doing is forcing the camera to use a daylight WB. And that's conflicting with the indoo... Promaster makes a pretty good unit at a decent price. If you buy one make sure you get the correct adapter because Promaster's use interchangeable adapters on the bottom of the flash unit for... Unless I'm mistaken, I don't think Canon makes an 18-55mm f2.8, a 55-200mm f2.8, or a 70-300mm f2.8. They make a 17-55mm f2.8 IS, a 70-200mm f2.8 L, and the 70-300mm is a f4.5-5.6. T... Interesting that you have a Nikon system and a Canon system(s) You will need a wide angle for one of the dSLRs. I would carry both bodies if you won't find that too confusing in the heat of ... yeah, you look good enough to stare at :) it looks like you are a laid back guy with a nice personality..maybe that is capturing their attention... ...Other than a Canon Speedlight, you might consider Sunpak, Sigma, or Metz flashes that are Canon compliant. However, finding a good flash for under $100 will be tough. You'd be better off wit... Adorama.com has a great set of tutorials for studio lighting. ...Other than specialty gear like the R1C1 ring, there are basically 3 options - SB400/600/800. The 400 is small, light, but relatively low-powered. The 600 is bigger, more powerful, but cannot ... |
Photography Categories--Copyright/IP Policy--Contact Webmaster |