|
|
| *SoulEyes Photography>>>Nude Photography |
Do you think nude photography of 16 year olds is bad? |
Im talking about those beautiful, artsy, ... private parts not always neccisarily exposed kind of photos. If the person or people in them is or are 16 do you think it is perfectly fine? Im a very liberal minded, artsy photographer person who loves shooting nudes (especially the artsy kind), but this bothers me...and I think it's illegal in most states in the US. I wouldnt recommend it....I understand the intent, but still...wouldnt recommend it. Source(s): Personal Experience :-) some might say "that's disgusting! it's pornography!" but i say, no, no, no, this is beautiful this is art prowler in the yard #1 I would find it offensive. There's no difference, or very little difference, between a 16 year old body and an 18 year old body. So, why not just use people of legal age and make everyone happy? It would be nice if we were a society of open nudity. But, the truth is that there are way to many perverts out there. Keep the nudity to 18 and over. Just my opinion. They say beauty is in the mind of the beholder. I would never photograph an individual under the age of 18 nude. It's more of my own personal morals. I know of professionals that do photograph minors nude and produce stunning results and I'm hapy for them - all the power to them. I don't believe it's right. At what point does artsy become vulgar or illegal? It's a fine line that I would never even want to come close to. |
| Tags |
| Sports Photography Professional Photography Popular Photography Portrait Photography Nude Photography Nature Photography Landscape Photography Flash Photography Digital Photography |
Photography Categories--Copyright/IP Policy--Contact Webmaster |