Is the work by Guillerno Vargas Habacuc about the dog, the artists or the spectator?

At first I wanted to attack the artist, but luckily I realised it is about the spectator. Hard to say if this really happened, but according to the photos and the fact that it happened in a gallery open to the public, proves to me that people witnessed it. The dog still died. Did anybody care to feed him? Don't tell me it wasn't allowed. Do it in secret then. Show you have a mind and heart of your own. Take turns. It is so easy so scapegoat someone. I think this only proves people's lack of accountability and responsibility. Congratulations to Guillerno to teach humanity about responsibility. Signing a petition is not enough. Action is what's needed. Let's all start today to make the world a better place. Get up from your computer, and become real artists. Start creating a better world!

don't think there was much of a question there....

but i agree... you're spot on...

Except it should be noted that most reliable sources state that they dog didn't even die... It escaped after the first night... Also, no eye witnesses have ever been found. Some people even believe that Vargas created the images of the dog (he is an artist afterall) and that the entire thing never even happened...

Even the animal rights people believed that the dog didn't die, if it ever even existed...


but regardless.... the human species is vargas' canvas... its truly amazing...