![]() |
|
| *SoulEyes Photography>>>Slr Digital Camera |
Digital SLR camera & lenses: Who has the best lense for standard and telephoto? Also, best camera? |
I looked at consumer reports - that rated the Nikon D40, D80 pretty highly. I like the 10 megapixels, but some people have been telling me its all about the lenses. Therefore, What lense to people recommend? I shoot with the nikon D80, an awesome camera. I haven't had any problems with it. My lens collection includes the 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 VR, 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6, and 50mm f/1.8. The camera body, depending on where you buy it, will cost you around a grand. If you're looking for a good lens, I can tell you that for the price (about $150), the 50mm f/1.8 is the best I own. It is known as a normal or standard prime lens and is both fast and extremely sharp. My 70-300mm VR lens is not the fastest lens I own, but with vibration reduction, aperture speed is less of a concern for what it is used for at the longest focal length, which with my image sensor crop, translates to 450mm, equivalent to what is seen with a full frame camera. I usually keep it around f/8 when shooting outdoors and I get very sharp images. It set me back around $600, not cheap, but cheaper than the 18-200mm VR superzoom which I wouldn't mind buying to replace my third lens, the 18-135mm f3.5-5.6. That lens was kitted with my D80 when I bought it and really of no use to me unless I need a wide shot. I used it to shoot some sunsets, but I prefer my 70-300mm VR for walking around town, and 50mm for shooting portraits. Third party lens manufacturers like Sigma also make very good optics and less the VR, sigmas 70-200mm f/2.8 is said to be sharper than the nikon equivalent with VR and almost a grand cheaper. I have my eyes set on the sigma 70mm f/2.8 macro to use as a portrait lens. A macro is great for portraits for the detail they render along with being a full 1:1 macro lens, it runs about $420. If you stick with the big 2 (canon and nikon) you won't be disappointed. nikon and cannon users will rubish the Alpha but it is the only one with image stabliser built into the body (other systems you pay mega buck for lens with image sta..) i like Nikon and prefer their equipment. Naturally i would suggest Nikon. However i have herd that cannon lenses are very good as well. But i use Nikon and i am very happ with all their equipment. I have a D2x a 17-55 28-70 105 micro and an 80-400 all Nikon and it all works great. if 1500 is your max and you only expect to get one lense go with the D80 and learn to use all the features. youll love it. Also you may be able to find a d200 w/ lens at that price slim chance but possible. anyway the D80 would be your best choice with Nikon lenses. Whoever told you that it was all about the lenses has no idea and has perhaps never used a camera. Some people just like to brag. The best cameras on the market are Nikons. Personally I love the D200. You just can't beat 10 meagpixels for the clairity and resolution. The photos make you think you're looking out a window. It's all about the resolution, that's where it's at. The type of camera really depends on what level of photography you want to jump to. If you want a camera that will last for years and will serve any purpose then I would highly recommend the D200. The lens, well that depends on what you want to do. I would recommend a Nikor 125 mm or even an 80 mm editorial lens. You will also need a good external flash. Hope that answers your question. Nikon hands down, one of the best...with any body you can use any Nikon lenses even if they're from an old film camera...Go to B&H.com for some good prices. Cannon aslo has some pretty high quality gear... |
Photography Categories--Copyright/IP Policy--Contact Webmaster |